Why we need an "Indian enlightenment", and "Enlightenments" in other developing countries
Humans have let
their creative juices flow since early times; the invention of fire,
proto-writing, pottery, arts and crafts, agriculture and metal-making would
bear ample testimony to this. Among early contributions to science and
technology, the contributions made by early Mesopotamians are highly
impressive. They made stellar contributions to metal-working, glass and lamp
making, architecture, the production of textiles and weaving, flood control,
water storage and irrigation. They also invented the earliest form of true
writing, namely Cuneiform in the middle of the fourth millennium before Christ.
Writing was usually mastered by scribes who were small in number in relation to
the total population, and was composed on clay tablets. The Epic of Gilgamesh
is among the world’s earliest literature, and is attributed to ancient
Mesopotamia. Libraries are also believed to have existed in Ancient
Mesopotamia. Mesopotamians made stellar contributions to mathematics, map
making, medicine and astronomy too, though true intellectualism in the modern
sense of the term probably did not exist then.
Egyptians
made important contributions to new technologies and concepts such as mummification,
medicine, irrigation, agriculture, glass-making, engineering, astronomy and grand
architecture. They also invented paper, their own form of hieroglyphic
writing, and built libraries, too. Indian science too took off in a big way in
early ancient times, and Indian innovation can be traced back to Mehrgarh, a
pre-Indus valley civilization site, now in Pakistan. Harappans developed
metallurgy, irrigation, agriculture, architecture, their own form of writing
besides other inventions and innovations such as weights and measures.
Alphabetic scripts and iron-making took off in Post-Harappan cultures in the Gangetic
plains, where there was some continuity with Harappan cultures, and Ancient
Indians made contributions to mathematics, astronomy and medicine too. In the
fifth century BC, the grammarian Panini made important contributions to the
study of Sanskrit grammar. An account of Ancient India is provided by
Megasthenes in his book Indica which is now considered to be lost. Indians also
contributed greatly to philosophy and intellectual thought as evidenced by the
Upanishads and Buddhism as well. In sum, Indian philosophical traditions include both orthodox (or Astika)
systems which include the Nyaya, Samkhya, Vaisheshika, Purva-Mimamsa (or
Mimamsa), Yoga and Vedanta schools of philosophy, and unorthodox (or Nastika)
systems, examples being Buddhist and Jaina traditions. Ancient Indian scholars
and intellectuals included Bhaskara, Varahamihira, Sushruta, Bramhagupta,
Aryabhatta and Bihana.
The
ancient Chinese too made significant technological advancements. Their
innovations included numerous advancements in the fields of mathematics,
natural sciences, engineering,
medicine,
military technology, geology and astronomy.
Their important inventions include paper making, the abacus, the sundial, and
the Kongming lantern. Their four great inventions are compass, gunpowder, paper
making and printing. The Chinese also developed their own writing system, and
contributed to literature in a big way. In imperial China, intellectuals were
termed as scholar officials or scholar gentlemen who made important
contributions to society. They had to pass examinations conducted by the king,
and were then granted academic degrees.
Ancient
Greece was a major centre of analytical thought and intellectualism, and
intellectualism particularly flourished there between the fifth century before
Christ to around the second century after Christ. Greek intellectual traditions
were even superior to, and easily eclipsed later Roman traditions. Inventions
that are often attributed to the ancient Greeks include the gear, screw, the
watermill, metal casting techniques, the water clock etc. Greeks also made
contributions to historiography, geography, and cartography. Greek thinkers
have included Plato, Aristotle, Herodotus, Archimedes, Epicurus, Thales of
Miletus, and many, many others. Roman intellectualism was not as sophisticated
as that of the Greeks, though they made some important contributions to
military technology and the art and the science of warfare. Some time before
the rise of contemporary Western civilization, the Islamic golden age was a
golden age of science and culture when polymath such as Ibn Khaldun and Ibn
Sina were born. Baghdad was then the centre of Islamic scientific traditions.
Many ancient works particularly from Greek, were translated into Arabic and
Persian during this period. Algebra, geometry, and calculus were developed
during this period. This age is also characterized by moderate Islam,
government sponsorship of intellectualism, the adoption of new technology, and
an openness to diverse influences.
The
modern glorious Western age of science, technology and intellectualism began
with the renaissance and the enlightenment. “Renaissance”
is a French word which means “rebirth.” This term refers to a period
in European civilization typically covering the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries,
and following the dark middle ages that was characterized by a revival of classical
learning and wisdom, and the desire to revive and surpass a golden past. The
renaissance is believed to have begun in Florence, Italy, and then spread
across Europe. The intellectual basis of the Renaissance
movement was an early version of humanism, derived from the Roman concept “humanitas” and
the rediscovery of Ancient Greek philosophy and values. This
period is marked by a flourishing of art, architecture, literature, science and
politics. The extended renaissance period saw great scientists and thinkers
such as Galileo Galilei, Isaac Newton, Nicolaus Copernicus, Johannes Kepler,
and Tycho Brahe emerge. Leornado Da Vinci and Michelangelo were also important
polymaths of this era.
The Age
of Enlightenment also commonly known as “the Age of reason”, was an important
intellectual and philosophical movement
that began in Europe, in the seventeenth and eighteenth
centuries, and had far-reaching implications worldwide. This period saw the
emergence of contemporary values such as liberty, equality, fraternity, religious
tolerance, individual rights, progress, scientific temper and a separation of
the church from the state. This period was preceded by the scientific
revolution, and the works of important philosophers such ad Francis Bacon, Montesquieu,
Baruch Spinoza, Immanuel Kant, Rene Descartes, Adam Smith and John Locke. These
were the important intellectuals of the period who also made several important
contributions to human advancement. Important published works during this era
were the “Esquisse d'un tableau historique des progres de l'esprit humain”,
“L’encyclopedie”, “Letters on the English”, “The wealth of nations”, “A
treatise of human nature”, and the “spirit of the laws”. [1] [2]
Since
then most important intellectuals have tended to be Western-based
(intellectualism has also been western-centric, and most important
technological advancements have occurred there) even though the East has
already partly risen. Western intellectuals like Karl Marx and Noam Chomsky have
exhibited decidedly Eurocentric approaches and tendencies, and this may partly
stem from a lack of understanding or appreciation of other cultures. Countries
like Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan have taken off in a big way beginning from
the end of the twentieth century particularly in varied fields of technology.
They have however lagged behind in true science and true intellectualism. Non-western
scholars and thinkers have blindly copied western concepts and paradigms in
their own contexts without modification or alteration, and this holds true even
for relatively much less intellectual pursuits such as the development of new
local-specific economic models.
Indian thinkers are mainly classified
into left-leaning thinkers and right-leaning thinkers. We may note here that
the idea of the left and right arose from a seating arrangement in the French
assembly in 1789 (around the time of the French revolution); it is from here
that these terms spread to other parts of the world, and the concept is similar
in different countries across and around the world, though there are indeed some
differences and variations from context to context. There is also some
consistency of interpretation with regard to the terms left and right in the
popular imagination, even though variations and misunderstandings sometimes
still persist. Others have sought to measure left-right orientation through the
use of measurement techniques, but such efforts may essentially be pointless. (Laponce
1981)
The far right is often associated with
pre-scientific construct or non-scientific constructs in India. Therefore, we have
Pushpak Vimanas and Ganesha statues drinking milk. Most of these ideas and approaches
are naturally brushed away and shrugged away by any serious scientist worth his
salt. While we do understand that left-leaning intellectuals and other
intellectuals from the non-left have also attempted to evolve and change with
the times particularly in the recent past (we owe a mountain of debt and gratitude
to them for all their endeavours and contributions), we will still argue that
the idea of intellectualism in general still needs a reboot, and that the
present state of affairs is far from satisfactory. These are still too many
ideological positions taken, and all current dispensations must gradually come
to an end as a new generation of scholars and researchers take over the field
and provide their crucial and critical inputs. Much of present-day
intellectualism is also based on obsolete paradigms like a blind and a dogmatic
opposition to globalization and capitalism regardless of whether it suits one’s
own interests or not. This is particularly true of countries like France and
India. Secondly, we also observe that the field is driven largely by the
pursuit of individual interests, and more collective thought and robust back-to
the basics theorization is required which must override all forms of vested
interests.
We also emphasize the need for
building robust intellectualism and scientific prowess in India and other developing
countries such that their own causes and interests are advanced. This is somewhat lacking at the present day
and time and the kind of intellectuals revolutions, renaissances and
enlightenments that the Western world has witnessed have not replicated
themselves in the rest of the world. Sometimes, concepts and ideas are borrowed
from the first world slavishly, and without any modification, adaptation or reconsideration
for local conditions. Therefore intellectualism is still widely driven by
Eurocentric considerations and interests. All these factors have apparently therefore
stymied progress in other parts of the world, and in some cases, prevented
these regions from regaining their past glory. The concepts, ideas and ideals
presented in this paper would overlap with our previously published papers, and
other scholars and researchers must also drive this process forward; they must also
collaborate with other developing countries through horizontal collaboration. Globalized
science activity will also naturally benefit science in general. It is also allow
for fundamentally better science to be birthed and gestated. This is yet another
reason why we call for an “Indian enlightenment”, and enlightenments in other developing
countries.
[1] Assis,
Arthur Alfaix (2021). "History of Ideas and Its Surroundings".
In: Bloomsbury History: Theory and Method. London: Bloomsbury Publishing
[2] Horowitz,
Maryanne Cline, ed. (2004). New Dictionary of the History of Ideas. New
York: Scribner. ISBN 978-0684313771.
Labels: Abhilasha:This is not utopia, Indian enlightenment, Sujay Rao Mandavilli
2 Comments:
https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=7hADEQAAQBAJ
https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=qDEHEQAAQBAJ
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home